Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ishmael Hodges's avatar

I think the whole “you don’t need drugs” line of thinking shows up in a lot of places. For instance, lots of fitness types hate Ozempic because they hate the idea of other people achieving with a pill what they achieved through hard work. I think maybe some in the meditation space feel similarly about psychedelics. Firstly, not everyone has the time, ability, or inclination to spend years developed a deep meditation practice that would rival what psychedelics can provide. Second, these things are not mutually exclusive. In the same way that someone who loses weight with Ozempic may then realize they’d like to put on some muscle, psychedelics provide a glimpse of what’s possible, and many find their way to meditation after as a more “sustainable” way of engaging in mindfulness.

Expand full comment
Janet Nietvelt's avatar

Such a great article. My husband and I, who are both in our 70s now, have been doing plant medicine work for about 4 years now both as a couple and in group settings. “Set and setting” (intention, recognition of the sacredness of the medicine, and facilitation by skilled practitioners) are key, but the integration piece that you talk about here is absolutely the most important element. That means practicing mindful living and communication every day, and seeing the world and our experiences in it as the curriculum in this earth school. This work has changed our relationship immensely. We have been studying the Bhagavad Gita and A Course in Miracles (ACIM) as part of our daily routine, and particularly in the latter, there is a recognition that one of the purposes of what the ACIM calls a sacred relationship is to break past the ego and realize who and what we truly are. This is achieved through human relationships in whatever form they take. In other words, human relationships are the “assignments” integral to learning. To have two people open to tackling this work together can yield profound changes not only for the couple, but for each as an individual.

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts